Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 FEBRUARY 2021

Michael Jordan Won Name Rights Dispute In China

On Dec 30, 2020, the Shanghai 2nd Intermediate People's Court issued a verdict of the first instance in the case of Michael Jordan v. Qiaodan

ChinaIntellectual Property

On Dec 30, 2020, the Shanghai 2nd Intermediate People's Court issued a verdict of the first instance in the case of Michael Jordan v. Qiaodan Sports Company and Bairen Trading Company for name rights disputes. The court held that the Qiaodan Sports Company, knowing that Michael Jordan has a high reputation, still chose the word "乔丹" (corresponding to Chinese translation of "Jordan" and pronounced as "Qiaodan") for trademark registration without authorization, and registered the company name "乔丹" (Qiaodan). Accordingly, the court ruled that Qiaodan Sports Company publicly apologized to the plaintiff in newspapers and on the internet, and should compensate the plaintiff for mental damage of RMB300,000 (USD46,000), and the plaintiff's reasonable expenses incurred in this lawsuit of RMB50,000 (USD7,700).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from