Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JUNE 2009

PRC Anti-Monopoly Law: Practical Aspects For Practitioners On Prior Notification Of Concentration Of Undertakings

The veto on March 18 of Coca-Cola's bid for China Huiyuan Juice Group by the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China has incited much discussion about the implementation of the PRC Anti-Monopoly Law, particularly the requirement of prior notification of concentrations of undertakings under Article 21.

ChinaAntitrust/Competition Law

The veto on March 18 of Coca-Cola's bid for China Huiyuan Juice Group ("Coca-Cola's case") by the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China ("MOFCOM") has incited much discussion about the implementation of the PRC Anti-Monopoly Law ("AML"), particularly the requirement of prior notification of concentrations of undertakings under Article 21. The notification in Coca-Cola's case was first submitted to MOFCOM on 18 September 2008, followed by four subsequent submissions of supplemental material upon MOFCOM's request.

On 5 January 2009, the Anti-Monopoly Bureau of MOFCOM ("AMB") replaced existing directives when they announced two new guidance opinions about notification of concentration of undertakings and the materials required for such a submission ("the new opinions"). Some commentaries claim the new opinions stem from the Coca-Cola submissions and characterise them as guidelines intended to replace individual information requests by MOFCOM on future

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from