Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 SEPTEMBER 2011

Commentary On Ouellet (Succession De) – A Will Cannot Be Contradicted… Unless It Contradicts The Testator!

This is a commentary on a Superior Court decision regarding a motion for improbation of a clause in a will that provided for distribution of the succession.

CanadaTax

This is a commentary on a Superior Court decision regarding a motion for improbation of a clause in a will that provided for distribution of the succession.

Introduction

In theory, it is well-established that in the presence of a clear will, the court will refuse to intervene and change the terms of the last wishes of a deceased person.

In Ouellet (Succession de),1 a group of heirs (siblings of the deceased) filed a motion for improbation of one particular sentence of the will that provided for distribution of the succession.

The Facts

The sentence contemplated by the improbation reads as follows:

[TRANSLATION] My intention being that the siblings who survive me, and all the nephews and nieces of my predeceased siblings, may inherit in equal shares by heads and not by roots.2

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from