Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MARCH 2016

Rolling Limitation Period Applied To Breach Of Covenant In Lease

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

When Does the Limitation Period Run in the Context of a Continuing Breach?

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

​When Does the Limitation Period Run in the Context of a Continuing Breach?

The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently answered this question in Pickering Square Inc. v. Trillium College Inc.

The facts of this case are simple. Trillium College Inc., the tenant in commercial space in a shopping centre, vacated its premises contrary to the lease which required the tenant to operate its vocational college business continuously throughout the term of the lease. The Court of Appeal held that the motion judge properly concluded that a fresh cause of action occurred every day that breach continued – every day that Trillium failed to carry on its business in the leased premises in accordance with the covenant in the lease. The limitation period in the case of a breach of a continuing obligation applies on a rolling basis. The two-year limitation period commences each day a fresh cause of action accrues and runs two years from that date.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from