Internal investigations are increasingly central to effective
corporate governance, driven by heightened expectations around
transparency, accountability and responsiveness to concerns about
corporate conduct. As these investigations become more frequent and
sophisticated, understanding their legal
implications—including the scope and application of
privilege—is essential.
A recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for
the Sixth Circuit in
FirstEnergy Corporation1has prompted renewed attention to privilege
in the context of internal investigations. While the case offers
valuable insights into U.S. law, it also provides a timely
opportunity to examine how Canadian courts approach privilege in
similar circumstances. This article uses the U.S. decision as a
springboard to explore the Canadian legal framework and offer
practical guidance for structuring internal investigations to
preserve privilege.