Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JULY 2011

Consumer Arbitration Clauses And Class Actions - The Latest From The Supreme Court*

On March 18, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Seidel v. TELUS Communications Inc,22011 SCC 15.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published in Possibilities, July 2011 The CBA National ADR Section Newsletter

Introduction

On March 18, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Seidel v. TELUS Communications Inc,22011 SCC 15. Seidel had commenced an intended class action in the British Columbia Supreme Court notwithstanding the following arbitration clause in her contract with TELUS:

15. ARBITRATION: Any claim, dispute or controversy (whether in contract or tort, pursuant to statute or regulation, or otherwise and whether pre-existing, present or future — except for the collection from you of any amount by TELUS Mobility) arising out of or relating to: (a) this agreement; (b) a phone or the service; (c) oral or written statements, or advertisements or promotions relating to this agreement or to a product or service; or (d) the relationships which result from this agreement (including relationships with third parties who are not parties to this agreement),

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from