Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MARCH 2016

Cassels Brock Litigators Defeat Jurisdictional Challenge In Cyber Libel Case

Cassels
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels

Cassels

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a Canadian law firm focused on serving the transaction, advocacy,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cassels

The plaintiff has alleged that 18 blog posts written by the defendant contained defamatory statements which have caused damage to the plaintiff's reputation in Ontario, Canada, and elsewhere.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On March 14, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released its decision in SciQuest Inc v Hansen et al, 2016 ONSC 1488, dismissing a defendant's motion to stay or dismiss a defamation action on the basis that the Ontario Superior Court did not have jurisdiction, or that another forum was more convenient for the trial of the action. The decision converts the established test for jurisdiction to hear a defamation action to the realities of the internet era. The court found that blog post views, "tweets", "retweets", and evidence of the plaintiff's reputation, all in Ontario, were sufficient to support a real and substantial connection to Ontario and that the plaintiff had not engaged in "forum shopping".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from