Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JANUARY 2026

Patent Infringement By Common Design Makes Its Entrance In Canada

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

The Federal Court's decision in Adeia Guides v Videotron, 2025 FC 1725 represents the first time a party has been found liable for patent infringement based on common design.

CanadaIntellectual Property

The Federal Court's decision in Adeia Guides v Videotron, 2025 FC 1725 represents the first time a party has been found liable for patent infringement based on common design. The court held that Videotron and its Helix TV service infringed the 187 and 674 Patents1 based on common design with Comcast, despite Comcast not being a party to the action.

Although the decision and the patents at issue relate to television and video services, the consideration of infringement by common design is an issue across subject matters. As the court commented: “Put simply, one cannot escape liability for patent infringement by virtue of subcontracting out a portion of the infringing act, or by being but one party to an overall harm towards another.”2

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from