Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 NOVEMBER 2019

Foreign Prosecution History Evidence Permitted Under Section 53.1 Of The Patent Act

Canmar Foods is also noteworthy as a rare example of a Court granting summary judgment in a patent infringement action in Canada.

CanadaIntellectual Property

The Federal Court has now released the first decision in which the scope of Section 53.1 of the Canadian Patent Act—the so-called "file wrapper estoppel" provision—has been considered. We recently published an IP Update describing new Section 53.1 and the state of the law regarding file wrapper estoppel in Canada.

In Canmar Foods Ltd v TA Foods Ltd, 2019 FC 1233 [Canmar Foods],the Court held that representations made by a patentee during prosecution of a foreign patent application constituted admissible evidence under Section 53.1. The Court recognized that Section 53.1 only specifies using Canadian prosecution file histories to rebut positions taken on claim construction, and makes no reference to prosecution histories from other jurisdictions. Notwithstanding, the Court found that it could consider the U.S. Application prosecution history as part of a purposive construction of the claims in issue, based on the "extraordinary circumstances" identified by the Court

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

See more popular content from