Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 NOVEMBER 2015

An Access Order Is Not A Suggestion

The Court of Appeal's recent decision in Godard has sent a firm message to parents: access orders are not simply a suggestion.

CanadaFamily and Matrimonial

A case comment on the Court of Appeal for Ontario decision in Godard v. Godard1

The Court of Appeal's recent decision in Godard has sent a firm message to parents: access orders are not simply a suggestion. A parent's failure to facilitate court-ordered access could give rise to a finding of contempt. Indeed, in Godard, the Court of Appeal upheld Justice Tremblay's finding that the mother was in contempt due to her failure to do all that she could to attempt to comply with the access order. Simply put, the access order required the mother to deliver the child to the paternal grandparents' home2 and the mother's failure to do so contributed to a finding of contempt.

In Godard, the mother had demonstrated a prior pattern of frustrating the father's access to the child, S., who was 12 years of age at the time of the father's contempt motion. In fact, in a prior court order, Justice Cornell noted that he had "serious concerns that the [mother] is engaged in a pattern

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from