Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JANUARY 2020

New Bureau Merger Challenge Evidences Effective M&A Strategies And Alleges Monopsony

Canada's Competition Bureau recently sued a Canadian agricultural company, seeking to unwind part of a closed transaction involving the company's purchase of grain elevators.

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

Canada's Competition Bureau recently sued a Canadian agricultural company, seeking to unwind part of a closed transaction involving the company's purchase of grain elevators. This case matters to business because:

  • it demonstrates that companies may have a valuable opportunity to close large transactions (and vendors can get paid) even though part of the transaction may potentially be anti-competitive.
  • it is the first public example of the Bureau taking action in respect of alleged "monopsony" (i.e., market power for the purchase of a product, rather than its sale).

Background

Parrish & Heimbecker (P&H) is a Canadian operator of grain elevators, grain processing assets and export terminals. In September 2019, P&H announced it would acquire 10 additional grain elevators in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia from Louis Dreyfus Company, and closed the transaction on December 10, 2019. The value of the transaction was not publicly disclosed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from