Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2008

Commissioner Of Competition V. Labatt: A Tempest In A Teapot?

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

Last April, we reported that the Competition Tribunal had dismissed an application by the Commissioner of Competition for an order under section 100 of the Competition Act to prevent the closing of Labatt’s acquisition of Lakeport Brewing – see M&A Bulletin, April 9, 2007, Labatt–Lakeport Transaction: Implications of the Competition Tribunal’s Dismissal of the Commissioner’s Application to Prevent the Merger Closing.

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

Last April, we reported that the Competition Tribunal had dismissed an application by the Commissioner of Competition for an order under section 100 of the Competition Act to prevent the closing of Labatt's acquisition of Lakeport Brewing – see M&A Bulletin, April 9, 2007, Labatt–Lakeport Transaction: Implications of the Competition Tribunal's Dismissal of the Commissioner's Application to Prevent the Merger Closing. On January 22, 2008, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the Commissioner's appeal of the Tribunal's decision. In doing so, the Court confirmed that the granting of section 100 orders is discretionary and it agreed with the Tribunal that the Commissioner's application in this case had failed to meet the statutory requirements for an order.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from