Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 SEPTEMBER 2011

Bar Orders In Price Fixing Class Action Settlements: The Uncertainty Continues

The Supreme Court of Canada recently dismissed an application for leave to appeal from decisions of the Ontario Court of Appeal and the British Columbia Court of Appeal, which had upheld the approval of a partial settlement reached with two out of five chocolate manufacturers against whom class actions were proposed in Ontario and British Columbia.

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

Introduction

The Supreme Court of Canada recently dismissed an application for leave to appeal from decisions of the Ontario Court of Appeal1 and the British Columbia Court of Appeal,2 which had upheld the approval of a partial settlement reached with two out of five chocolate manufacturers against whom class actions were proposed in Ontario and British Columbia. The proposed class actions alleged a conspiracy to raise, maintain, fix and/or stabilize the price of chocolate products sold in Canada.3 The settlement agreement contained a bar order that the non-settling defendants, who sought leave to appeal, viewed as depriving them of their substantive rights to seek contribution and indemnity from the settling defendants.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from