Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MAY 2013

The Cost of a Cup of Coffee: compensation for burns

The facts, issues, needs and competing interests are all considered to reach a fair, balanced and accountable outcome.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
David Kew (Previously With Kott Gunning)
David Kew (Previously With Kott Gunning)
Author LinkedIn connections

Readers may have heard of the recent report of an Adelaide woman suing McDonalds over the spillage of a cup of coffee which is alleged to have caused severe burns. It sounds similar to the US case from two decades ago in which an elderly lady pursued a similar claim, resulting in a significant damages award. [An interesting analysis of the facts of that case can be found at www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm suggesting that the public's understanding of the case may not have been entirely accurate].

It begs the question: what are we in Australia to make of such claims and what approach should we be taking here to allocate risk consistently and fairly?

It is tempting to conclude that, as a society, we are becoming increasingly comfortable with the idea of shifting blame to others and increasingly less willing to assume that risks are ours alone (see for example Ashley Crisp's article here).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from