Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JUNE 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Submissions "Duly Made" & The Scope Of The Adjudicator's Obligation To Consider

The recent case of Bega Valley Shire Council v Kenpass Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 399 ("Bega Council v Kenpass") discusses the level of consideration an adjudicator...

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Bega Valley Shire Council v Kenpass Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 399

The recent case of Bega Valley Shire Council v Kenpass Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 399 ("Bega Council v Kenpass") discusses the level of consideration an adjudicator must have for each party's arguments under section 22(2) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) ("SOPA").

Issues

In Bega Council v Kenpass, Bega Valley Shire Council ("the Council") unsuccessfully sought to set aside an adjudication determination in favour of Kenpass on the grounds of jurisdictional error.

The jurisdictional error alleged by the Council was with respect to a part of the adjudication determination concerning the quantification of delay damages. The Council challenged this on three grounds:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from