Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JANUARY 2015

Proportionate liability in Commonwealth legislation: Full Federal Court disagrees with itself

The Full Federal Court recently delivered two conflicting judgments on a key issue in proportionate liability regimes.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the space of a week, the Full Federal Court delivered two conflicting judgments on a key issue in proportionate liability regimes under Commonwealth legislation.

This decision comes at a time where, following the 2013 High Court decision in Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd & Anor v Vella & Ors (see " High Court gives guidance on proportionate liability") and the release of the draft model legislation (see " Proportionate liability: model legislation released"), it was hoped that some of the uncertainty around proportionate liability would be resolved. However, as these cases demonstrate, there is a still a long way to go.

What is proportionate liability?

Proportionate liability was introduced to modify the common law rule of joint and several liability, so that defendants were only liable for the proportion of the damage that they had caused. The proportionate liability legislation was intended to prevent one wrongdoer being held responsible for the entire

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from