Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 FEBRUARY 2013

Paying the Price - Cost Implications of Offers, Credibility and Unmeritorious Arguments

The award leaves the appellant with less in her pocket and, maybe, a different view of the initial offer of compromise.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Partridge -v- Hobart City Council & Ors (No2) [2013] TASFC 1

Background

  • The appellant sued the respondents for damages in respect of injuries suffered as a result of a fall down an external stairway.
  • Prior to trial the respondents made an offer of compromise to the appellant in the sum of $300,000 plus party/party costs which was not accepted. Also, the appellant made an offer of compromise to concede 30% contributory negligence which was not accepted.
  • At first instance the appellant was awarded $295,350, being significantly less than the damages she sought and less than the respondent's offer of compromise. A finding of 20% contributory negligence was made, being less than what the appellant had offered to concede.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from