Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 DECEMBER 2020

Federal Court examines ambit of model litigant principles in Queensland

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

The ambit of the model litigant principles was tested in the context of a recent Queensland native title claim proceeding.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Paul Venus
Paul Venus
Suzy Cairney
Suzy Cairney
Author LinkedIn connections

The ambit of the model litigant principles that apply to Commonwealth, state, local governments and other government entities was tested in the context of a recent Queensland native title claim proceeding, Malone on behalf of the Western Kangalou People v State of Queensland [2020] FCA 1188.

The standard of conduct required by the Commonwealth government under the model litigant principles has been previously considered by the Federal Court. In Brandon v Commonwealth,the Court had observed that "while the Commonwealth is no doubt a behemoth of sorts, it is not obliged to fight with one hand behind its back in proceedings. It has the same rights as any other litigant notwithstanding it assumes for itself, quite properly, the role of a model litigant"1.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

See more popular content from