Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 SEPTEMBER 2019

Expert valuation evidence - when you should do more than use your brain

Recent case provides a valuable insight into what the court will consider when determining the reliability of expert evidence.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Max Mikha (Formerly With Bartier Perry)
Max Mikha (Formerly With Bartier Perry)
Author LinkedIn connections

The recent decision in Eckford v Six Mile Creek Pty Ltd (No.2) [2019] FCA 1307 (Eckford) provides a valuable insight into the Court's considerations when determining the reliability of expert evidence.

It is also a timely reminder for experts that care and skill must be applied when forming an opinion and giving evidence during the course of proceedings, whether that be through the provision of an expert report or providing oral testimony.

Background

Mr Eckford commenced proceedings against Six Mile Creek alleging, amongst other things, that Six Mile Creek made misrepresentations during the sale of a lot of land. The substance of Six Mile Creek's representations in 2007 were as follows:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from