Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 NOVEMBER 2026

Presumed Facts In Queensland Pleadings

Rule 151 of Queensland's Uniform Civil Procedure Rules governs when parties may omit facts from pleadings based on legal presumptions or burden of proof allocation. This article examines the precise boundaries of that permission through defamation cases, Australian Consumer Law representations about future matters, and the distinct treatment of conditions precedent, explaining what must still be pleaded despite presumptions.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Article Summary

Presumed Facts in Queensland Pleadings are governed by UCPR rule 151. A party may omit a fact presumed by law in its favor, or one it does not bear the burden of proving, unless the fact must be pleaded to comply with rule 149 or to meet another party’s denial.

The material facts that engage a presumption must still be pleaded.

The article explains those limits through defamation, future representations under Australian Consumer Law section 4, and the separate rule for conditions precedent.

A defamation plaintiff need not ordinarily prove falsity, but must still establish the other elements of the claim, including serious harm. ACL section 4 provides a statutory starting point on reasonable grounds; it does not reverse the ultimate burden of proof or establish reliance, causation, or loss.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from