Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 NOVEMBER 2021

Expert determination under GC21 - alternative dispute resolution can create disputes

Sometimes ADR provisions themselves are the cause of disputes. Recent case example discussed.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Because disputes are common in construction projects, most construction contracts contain alternative dispute resolution (ADR) clauses requiring disputes to be resolved by processes such as mediation, arbitration and expert determination.

The main purpose of ADR is to save time and money and to keep matters out of Court, away from public scrutiny. However, sometimes ADR provisions themselves are the cause of disputes.

New South Wales Government GC21 Edition 2 is the form of contract usually employed by NSW Government agencies for construction contracts valued at $1 million or more, or of lower value but with complex contractual requirements.

Recently, the NSW Supreme Court had occasion to consider the meaning of the standard ADR clause in that contract. The decision (CPB Contractors Pty Ltd v Transport for NSW) suggests that a change to the provision might be warranted.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from