Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 DECEMBER 2017

Commencing proceedings before complying with dispute resolution procedures under a contract

Where parties to a commercial contract agree to a dispute resolution procedure, they should comply with that procedure.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

IN BRIEF - FEDERAL COURT REFUSES STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

The recent Federal Court decision in Buurabalayji Thalanyji Aboriginal Corporation v Onslow Salt Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1240 confirms the position that where parties to a commercial contract agree to a particular dispute resolution procedure, they must comply with that procedure unless the party wishing to abandon it, in favour of recourse to the courts, can show good cause.

APPLICATION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT DUE TO ONE PARTY'S NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE

Commercial agreements are drafted to address a range of circumstances that could arise under a contract, including how parties are to resolve disputes when they arise. While each dispute resolution clause (DRC) will vary depending on the nature of the agreement between the parties, they routinely prescribe certain procedures and preconditions for resolving disputes under a contract (including timeframes), prior to commencing

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from