Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 NOVEMBER 2007

Case Note: Petracho v Griffiths [2007] NSWCA 302 26 October 2007

When alleging contributory negligence, based upon the failure to wear a seatbelt, the onus is on the Defendant to establish that a seatbelt was not worn. Where only one party has obtained an expert’s report on an issue, the Court is not obliged to accept that expert’s opinion.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Brief

  • When alleging contributory negligence, based upon the failure to wear a seatbelt, the onus is on the Defendant to establish that a seatbelt was not worn.
  • Where only one party has obtained an expert’s report on an issue, the Court is not obliged to accept that expert’s opinion.
  • When giving expert evidence, an expert witness is required to be objective and take into account anomalies in the case which may support a different conclusion.

Background

The NSW Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Petracho v Griffiths on 26 October 2007. The decision concerned an appeal by the Defendant from a decision by Murrell DCJ, refusing to make any reduction for contributory negligence. The Defendant argued at first instance that the Plaintiff contributed to his injuries because he had failed to wear a seatbelt.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from