Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 NOVEMBER 2011

Blameless accident provisions considered – 14-year old pedestrian at fault

Where a pedestrian's own negligence caused, or contributed to the accident, the accident will not be "blameless".

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Judgment date: 28 November 2011

Axiak by her tutor D. Axiak v Ingram [2011] NSWSC 1447

Supreme Court of New South Wales1

In Brief

  • The definition of "fault" in s 3 extends to include contributory negligence for the purposes of identifying whether an accident is "blameless" within Division 1 of Part 1.2.
  • Where a pedestrian's own negligence caused, or contributed to the accident, the accident will not be "blameless".
  • Contributory negligence in s 7F applies to matters where the injured person's own lack of care contributes to his or her own injuries, but which did not cause the accident itself, such as where a passenger fails to wear a seat belt.

Background

At approximately 4 pm on Thursday, 26 June 2008 the plaintiff (who was then 14 years old) and her younger sister were passengers on a school bus travelling in a northerly direction along Sackville Road, Ebenezer. The bus pulled partly onto the road shoulder opposite the plaintiff's home and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from