Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 AUGUST 2026

Australia Court Confirms Proceedings May Be Split Between Court And Arbitration

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

A New South Wales Court of Appeal decision examines how arbitration agreements operate when only part of a dispute is arbitrable, particularly in complex insolvency contexts. The ruling clarifies when proceedings can be split between court and arbitration, establishes limits on arbitrability in insolvency matters, and sets a high threshold for waiving arbitration rights.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A recent decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal1 addressed the operation of section 7 of the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) in circumstances where only part of a dispute fell within an arbitration agreement. The decision provides important guidance on the identification of arbitrable “matters,” mandatory stay of proceedings and the limits of arbitrability. While arising in the context of a major construction joint venture dispute, its implications extend more broadly to parties to international commercial contracts in Australia, particularly in complex, multiparty disputes.

Background

Elecnor Australia Pty Ltd (Elecnor) and Clough Projects Australia Pty Ltd (Clough) were joint venture partners on Project EnergyConnect, a major electricity transmission infrastructure project for Transgrid. Following Clough’s insolvency in late 2022 and the subsequent implementation of a deed of company arrangement (DOCA), a dispute arose concerning the ownership of Clough’s

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from