Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2022

Arbitration Is No Bar For Bank Guarantees

NSWSC 1125, Daewoo sought to prevent INPEX from calling on a bank guarantee. The Supreme Court ruled against Daewoo.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co Ltd v INPEX Operations Australia Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1125, Daewoo sought to prevent INPEX from calling on a bank guarantee. The Supreme Court ruled against Daewoo.

Under a construction contract, the Principal may be entitled to call on a bank guarantee, even while the parties are involved in arbitration.

The Court is unlikely to intervene on the "life blood of commerce" and restrict a party from calling on bank guarantees, unless presented with a strong or serious prima facie case.

Background:

INPEX contracted with Daewoo to construct a Floating Production Storage Offloading Facility (FPSO). Daewoo built the ship, but INPEX issued a claim for losses suffered due to Daewoo's alleged defects and delays.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from