Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2021

Deficient Deadlock: Winding Up On Just And Equitable Grounds Refused

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

While disagreements often occur in the course of operating a company, much more is needed before a wind up is justified.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This week's TGIF considers an application to wind up a company on just and equitable grounds. The Court declined to make the order, finding the suggested deadlock had an air of artificiality and the application was infused with self-interest.

Key takeaways

  • Placing a company into liquidation on just and equitable grounds is a remedy of last resort and relief may not be granted if alternative and less drastic remedies available.
  • While a deadlock is a common case for winding up, more than a mere breakdown or loss of confidence is required before such an order is justified.
  • A court will be less likely to exercise its discretion if the person seeking relief was responsible for the breakdown of the relationship.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from