Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 NOVEMBER 2013

Native title rights to fish mean that state legislation is mere abalone

Native title rights to hunt, fish and gather trump state legislation that conflicts with the exercise of those rights,.

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector

Key Points:

Karpany v Dietman confirms the position in Yanner v Eaton.

The High Court has handed down a decision which further confirms that native title rights to hunt, fish and gather can trump state legislation that conflicts with the continued exercise of such rights, effectively creating a dichotomy of rights and practical difficulties for policing compliance.

In Karpany v Dietman [2013] HCA 47, a father and son who were traditional owners in the Yorke Peninsula area in South Australia took 24 undersized abalone while fishing. The Fisheries Management Act 2007 (SA) (FMA 2007) and its predecessor, the Fisheries Act 1971 (SA) (FA 1971), prohibit a person from taking fish and other marine creatures except as provided by the Act (this included size restrictions) or unless the person held a licence. The men were members of the Narrunga People and the abalone were taken in accordance with their traditional laws and customs.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from