Search
Search
Menu
Menu
Close
Close
Close
Search
Rankings
Jurisdictions
Submissions
Research+
Green Guide
Future Lawyers
Firms & Lawyers
Service Providers
Barristers’ Sets
Networks
Interview with…
In-House
In-House Content
GC Powerlist
Knowledge Centre
Data Products
Legal Business
News & Developments
Special Reports
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Contact us
Comparative Guides
Events
Legal 500 TV
About us
Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Contact us
Deutschland
DE
Paris
FR
home
Rankings
United States
Media, technology and telecoms
Cyber law (including data privacy and data protection)
Firms
Lawyers
How are firms ranked?
All firms
Global
National
What does global and national mean?
Client satisfaction
What is client satisfaction?
1
Baker McKenzie LLP
Firm profile
Compare
1
Cooley LLP
Firm profile
Compare
1
DLA Piper LLP (US)
Firm profile
Compare
1
Hogan Lovells US LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
1
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
1
Latham & Watkins LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
1
Morrison Foerster
Firm profile
Compare
1
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Firm profile
Compare
1
Venable LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
2
Akin
Firm profile
Compare
2
BakerHostetler
Firm profile
Compare
2
Dechert LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
2
Jones Day
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
2
Linklaters LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
Mayer Brown
Firm profile
Compare
2
McDermott Will & Schulte
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
2
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Firm profile
Compare
2
WilmerHale
Firm profile
Compare
2
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Compare
2
Eversheds Sutherland
Compare
3
Alston & Bird LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Davis+Gilbert LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
3
Freshfields
Firm profile
Compare
3
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
King & Spalding LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Paul Hastings LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Proskauer Rose LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
3
Ropes & Gray LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Sidley Austin LLP
Firm profile
Compare
3
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
3
Fenwick & West LLP
Compare
3
Reed Smith LLP
Compare
4
Arnold & Porter
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
4
Clark Hill Plc
Firm profile
Compare
4
Crowell & Moring LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
4
Goodwin
Firm profile
Compare
4
Greenberg Traurig
Firm profile
Compare
4
Hausfeld LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Loeb & Loeb LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Winston & Strawn LLP
Firm profile
Compare
4
Hintze Law
Compare
4
McGuireWoods LLP
Compare
ArentFox Schiff
Firm profile
Compare
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Firm profile
Compare
Husch Blackwell LLP
Firm profile
Compare
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Client satisfaction
Firm profile
Compare
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Firm profile
Compare
Comparative Guides
View
View
Blockchain & Crypto Assets
United States
Contribution from
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP