Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 SEPTEMBER 2021

Seventh Circuit Finds Collective Bargaining Agreement Arbitration Clause Not ‘Sufficiently Specific'

The case involved a dispute between a pilot diagnosed with Type II diabetes and the airline.

United StatesTransport

Considering an airline's appeal, the Seventh Circuit in Cloutier v. GoJet Airlines LLC, provided additional guidance about what is needed to require arbitration of federal antidiscrimination claims.

The case involved a dispute between a pilot diagnosed with Type II diabetes and the airline.  Under FAA regulations, he was not permitted to pilot an airplane until he received medical clearance from an FAA-approved doctor, a process that would take at least 60 days.  After notifying the airline of his diagnosis, the pilot received leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act.  However, the airline terminated his employment weeks later.

The pilot and his union sought to arbitrate a grievance under the collective bargaining agreement, but the airline, claiming the pilot improperly commenced the arbitration, refused to arbitrate.  Consequently, the pilot brought his claims in court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from