Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 DECEMBER 2019

SDNY: The ADA Preempts Removed Passenger's Tort Claims

A flight attendant on a Spirit Airlines flight asked a passenger seated in an emergency exit row to stop using his cell phone while she conducted the exit row safety briefing.

United StatesTransport

A flight attendant on a Spirit Airlines flight asked a passenger seated in an emergency exit row to stop using his cell phone while she conducted the exit row safety briefing. The parties disagreed about whether the passenger complied with the instruction, and gave conflicting accounts of the ensuing interactions between the passenger and the crew. The passenger eventually deplaned before the flight departed, though the parties disputed whether he did so voluntarily.

The passenger brought a pro se lawsuit against Spirit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ("SDNY"). The passenger pled several tort claims, as well as claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Spirit sought summary judgment on the grounds that the Airline Deregulation Act ("ADA"), which expressly preempts any state law "related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier," preempted the passenger's claims.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from