Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 AUGUST 2018

If You Liked This Railroad Argument, You'll Love "Competitive Access"

The unintended consequences of regulatory action may sometimes come as a surprise, but often there are clues that could inform decision makers—if they know where to look.

United StatesTransport

Paul R. Hitchcock is Senior Policy Advisor based in Holland & Knight's Jacksonville office

The unintended consequences of regulatory action may sometimes come as a surprise, but often there are clues that could inform decision makers—if they know where to look.

Two colossuses of the rail industry, Union Pacific Railroad (UP) and BNSF Railway Company, are butting heads over UP's right (or lack of a right) to perform switching operations on a BNSF main line in Washington state. As readers of this blog are certainly aware, each privately-owned railroad operates over its own proprietary rail lines, and only in limited cases does the owner share rights to use its tracks with another railroad. Such an arrangement—called trackage rights—was entered into by predecessors of UP and BNSF in 1909. The purpose of the arrangement was to allow each railroad to reach and serve a jointly-owned switching railroad which picks up and delivers traffic to customers on behalf of both

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from