Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 AUGUST 2026

The Research Integrity Challenge Behind ORI's New AI Guidance

Ankura's insights hub showcases the firm's latest research and analysis across cybersecurity, artificial intelligence governance, joint venture risk management, and regulatory compliance. From ORI's new AI guidance for research integrity to the DOJ's bulk data security requirements, these articles examine emerging challenges facing organizations in technology, finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure sectors.

United StatesTechnology

The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) released its “Guidance on Generative Artificial Intelligence” on August 14, 2026.1 The guidance does not create a new category of artificial intelligence (AI) misconduct, nor does it alter the legal standard for research misconduct under 42 CFR Part 93.2 Instead, it applies the existing framework to a rapidly evolving technological environment and, in doing so, highlights a new readiness challenge for research institutions. Institutions may increasingly need the policies, expertise, documentation practices, and evidentiary capabilities necessary to evaluate AI-related conduct under standards that were not written specifically for AI.

The significance of the guidance lies less in what it changes legally than in what it changes operationally. A finding of research misconduct still requires a significant departure from accepted practices of the relevant research community, intentional, knowing, or reckless conduct, and proof by a preponderance of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from