Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MARCH 2026

Supreme Court Denies Petition On Copyright Authorship By AI

Baker Botts L.L.P.
Baker Botts L.L.P.
Contributor
Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts is a leading international law firm with 11 offices located in the US, Europe, and the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker Botts L.L.P.

On March 2, 2026, the Supreme Court denied certiorari filed by Dr. Stephen Thaler, who sought review of the U.S. Copyright Office's denial of copyright protection to various works created by Thaler's "DABUS" artificial intelligence.

United StatesTechnology

On March 2, 2026, the Supreme Court denied certiorari filed by Dr. Stephen Thaler, who sought review of the U.S. Copyright Office's denial of copyright protection to various works created by Thaler's "DABUS" artificial intelligence.

The key question presented in the petition was "[w]hether works outputted by an AI system without a direct, traditional authorial contribution by a natural person can be copyrighted." The petition came after a judgment by the D.C. Circuit which affirmed (from the District Court of D.C.) the Copyright Office's refusal to register a copyright in a work generated by the DABUS model, on the basis that it "lack[ed] the human authorship necessary to support a copyright claim."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from