Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2013

The Construction Trial Will Be Held Far, Far Away!

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

Suppose you’re a New Jersey subcontractor on a New Jersey project, where the project owner is based in New York and the prime contractor in Wisconsin.

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

Suppose you're a New Jersey subcontractor on a New Jersey project, where the project owner is based in New York and the prime contractor in Wisconsin. Suppose in addition that you sign a subcontract calling for disputes to be resolved by arbitration in Wisconsin. And suppose further that once a dispute arises you consider Wisconsin to be an inconvenient place for the arbitration. Will a New Jersey court agree? Don't count on it.

A federal court, in the case of Hautz Construction, LLC v. H&M Department Store, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12215 (N.J., Jan. 28, 2013), has just confirmed that trial venue clauses will normally be upheld. The current decision is located here (subscription required). A prior decision in the same case and on the same issue can be read here.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from