A public agency's acquisition of private property can
sometimes trigger significant severance damages due to eliminating
access, cutting off utility service, or taking a substantial
portion of a property's parking. As agencies look to get more
creative in minimizing exposure to large damages claims, they will
sometimes offer up mitigation alternatives, such as providing an
alternative access, or new utility service, or replacement parking,
with such rights being granted from an adjacent or neighboring
property. These mitigation solutions are often a win-win for
property owners and public agencies, as a landowner is made whole,
and an agency avoids a large damages claim. But can the government
force another nearby property owner to give up their property
rights for such mitigation solutions? There are a few situations,
outlined below, where additional land can be acquired or
substituted.