On October 6, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief in a case that turns on whether a plaintiff has Article III standing to sue for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA") without showing actual harm. Reversing the district court, the Ninth Circuit ruled in February that an alleged violation of the plaintiff's FCRA statutory rights established an injury sufficient to satisfy Article III.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
