Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JANUARY 2026

NAD Suggests Changes To Price Comparison Advertising

Loeb & Loeb LLP
Loeb & Loeb LLP
Contributor
Loeb & Loeb LLP

Loeb & Loeb LLP

Loeb & Loeb LLP is a multi-service law firm with more than 400 lawyers focusing on select core...

View firm profile
Explore more from Loeb & Loeb LLP

The National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs (NAD) recently issued a final decision in a competitive challenge brought by Ahold Delhaize USA against Lidl US...

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

The National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs (NAD) recently issued a final decision in a competitive challenge brought by Ahold Delhaize USA against Lidl US, LLC concerning Lidl's comparative grocery price advertising. 

The challenged ads included statements such as “Save over 30% on the exact same basket when shopping at Lidl versus Stop & Shop,” “Save up to $28 on the exact same basket when shopping at Lidl vs. Giant,” and “Skip Food Lion. Save $27.” 

Comparative Pricing Claims Generally

A major focus of the decision was the timing of Lidl's price comparisons. Ahold submitted evidence that its grocery prices change weekly across thousands of SKUs. Lidl countered that its own prices are relatively stable and that it disclosed the date of comparison in its ads.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from