Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 FEBRUARY 2026

Worried Three's A Crowd? Decline Intervention At Your Own Peril

Crowell & Moring LLP
Crowell & Moring LLP
Contributor
Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring LLP

Crowell & Moring’s Doha office is a full service legal practice that serves as the firm’s regional...

View firm profile
Explore more from Crowell & Moring LLP

Last week, the Federal Circuit heard oral argument in Global K9 Protection Group, LLC v. United States, a bid protest appeal concerning, in part, whether an awardee who chose not to intervene at the outset of the protest should have been allowed to do so after its award was enjoined.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Last week, the Federal Circuit heard oral argument inGlobal K9 Protection Group, LLC v. United States, a bid protest appeal concerning, in part, whether an awardee who chose not to intervene at the outset of the protest should have been allowed to do so after its award was enjoined.

Although the decision remains pending, the panel seemed unsympathetic to the awardee's argument that, due to a lack of certain redacted filings, the awardee did not know there were allegations against it. For example, one judge on the panel noted that the Court could not now "unwind everything" and that if the awardee wished to intervene to protect its award, the time to do so was at the outset of the protest.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from