Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JUNE 2024

U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Arbitrability Disputes When Contracts Conflict

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Explore more from Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

The Supreme Court of the United States has decided another case that affects enforcement of arbitration clauses. Coinbase v. Suski concerned users of a crypto exchange.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Supreme Court of the United States has decided another case that affects enforcement of arbitration clauses. Coinbase v. Suski concerned users of a crypto exchange. When the users registered with the exchange, they executed a user agreement that contained an arbitration requirement with a delegation clause, meaning "an arbitrator must decide all disputes under the contract, including whether a given disagreement is arbitrable." Coinbase later offered a sweepstakes in which the official rules for entries instead "contained a forum selection clause, providing that all disputes related to that contract must be decided in California courts."

The conflict between the user agreement and the official rules became a problem when users filed a class-action complaint arising from the sweepstakes. Coinbase moved to compel arbitration based on the user agreement. The users resisted, relying on the sweepstakes official rules. The Supreme Court ruled that where a conflict

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from