Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JULY 2023

Unveiling Privilege Challenges In Joint Corporate Defense Agreements

Four co-defendants meet with their joint defense counsel to discuss a pending lawsuit. The meeting ends and all participants are confident that the discussions will remain private.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Four co-defendants meet with their joint defense counsel to discuss a pending lawsuit. The meeting ends and all participants are confident that the discussions will remain private. There is just one problem. One of the co-defendants recorded the conversation. And that co-defendant is ready to talk. Can that co-defendant waive the privilege for all defendants, or must all co-defendants consent?

In Howard v. IOMAXIS, LLC, the North Carolina Supreme Court considered this question, albeit in a narrower corporate context. Even so, parties and attorneys involved in joint representations should heed its warnings.

The law firm in IOMAXIS represented an LLC and its four members in a business court lawsuit. The firm provided general corporate counsel to the LLC. For this lawsuit, the law firm entered a separate engagement letter with the LLC and the four members. This second agreement provided that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from