Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 APRIL 2022

This Week At The Ninth: Flea Collars And Milkers

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

This week, the Court orders the EPA to reexamine its approval of a pesticide used in pet collars, and addresses the federal statute prohibiting forced labor.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This week, the Court orders the EPA to reexamine its approval of a pesticide used in pet collars, and addresses the federal statute prohibiting forced labor.

NRDC v. EPA 

The Court holds that EPA denial of a petition to cancel pesticide registration was not supported by substantial evidence and could not be justified by post-hoc rationalizations.

The Panel: Chief Judge Murguia, Judge Cole (CA6), and Judge Gould, with Judge Gould writing the opinion.

Key Highlight: "At times, NRDC's efforts to receive a reasoned response from EPA have seemed Sisyphean as the agency consistently delayed its decision. After NRDC had doggedly pursued this matter for more than a dozen years . . . NRDC was justified in expecting a rational, supported, and reasoned response from EPA. EPA, though, did not provide a well-reasoned or reasonable decision."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from