Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 OCTOBER 2026

Third District Court Rejects OLC’s Interpretation Of CFPB Funding Statute

Ballard Spahr LLP
Ballard Spahr LLP
Contributor
Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP, an AmLaw 100 law firm with 19 US offices, serves clients in more than 50...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ballard Spahr LLP

A federal district court in Oregon has rejected the Office of Legal Counsel's interpretation of the CFPB's funding statute, holding that "combined earnings" refers to Federal Reserve revenue rather than profits. Judge Ann Aiken also ruled that the CFPB Acting Director has a statutory duty to request necessary funding, marking the third district court decision on this critical issue.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Judge Aiken Holds That “Combined Earnings” Means Federal Reserve Revenue, Not Profit

In a September 25, 2026, decision, Judge Ann Aiken of the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon became the third federal district judge to reject the Office of Legal Counsel’s interpretation of the statutory mechanism Congress established to fund the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In State of New York v. Vought, Judge Aiken held that the “combined earnings” of the Federal Reserve System, from which the CFPB is funded, means the Federal Reserve’s gross revenues before expenses are deducted. She also held that the CFPB Acting Director has a statutory duty to request the funds that he determines are reasonably necessary for the Bureau to carry out its responsibilities.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from