Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 SEPTEMBER 2011

The Rise And Fall Of Class Arbitration

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Contributor
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

In an increasingly global and interconnected world, Hughes Hubbard sets itself apart as a robust...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Class arbitration is a useful procedural device in need of a friend. It is the first choice of almost no one as a means of resolving disputes involving large numbers of claimants or respondents.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Article by John M. Townsend1

First published in AAA Yearbook on Arbitration & the Law 2010

Class arbitration is a useful procedural device in need of a friend. It is the first choice of almost no one as a means of resolving disputes involving large numbers of claimants or respondents. Rather, it is primarily a creature of the courts: The Supreme Court called it into existence in its Bazzle decision in 2003, and effectively disowned it in its Stolt-Nielsen decision in 2010.2 Nevertheless, it has real advantages to offer as a method of dispute resolution, if the adversaries in the ongoing battle over class actions would stop shooting at each other long enough to consider them.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from