Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 APRIL 2026

The Headline Problem In Defamation Law: A Proposal For Fixing Illinois’ And Ohio’s Outdated Innocent Construction Rule

Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP
Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP

Defamation lawsuits are on the rise in the United States, and have been for several years. Because defamation litigation is so increasingly relied upon as a means to address reputational injury...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Takeaways

  • Defamation law generally requires courts to read allegedly defamatory statements in full context, but Illinois’ and Ohio’s “innocent construction rule” often shields misleading headlines by relying on clarifying body text—even though many readers never read past the headline.
  • In a headline-driven media environment, this approach can permit material reputational harm without accountability, increasing legal, reputational and business risks for individuals and organizations affected by inaccurate or sensationalized headlines.
  • Courts should adapt by severing and independently analyzing headlines that are not “substantially accurate” summaries of the article, incentivizing publishers to ensure headlines align with underlying facts and reducing exposure to modern forms of defamation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from