There's something wrong with the story that follows after
the jump.
Actually, there's one big thing wrong, which is the product
of a lot of little things.
To get the full effect, imagine that it is set out in 12 point,
double-spaced, Times New Roman with one inch margins.
In a post (or posts) to come, my head will explode about why we
lawyers write so poorly. Is there a law somewhere that says we must
. . . .
But I digress.
After the jump is the story. Any resemblance between my story
and a brief you may have sent me to edit is purely
coincidental.
Or at least really really exaggerated to make a point.
COMES NOW, Dr. Thomas Muffet
(hereinafter "Muffet" or "APPELLANT") and by
fourteen points of error does hereby challenge the judgment of the
Family Court in terminating his parental rights viz. his
adopted step-daughter, Patience Muffet (hereinafter, "the
Child") for, inter alia, endangering the Child on or
about June 7, 2010 by exposing the Child to a
