Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 APRIL 2013

The Alien Tort Statute: Kiobel Dials It Back

The U.S. Supreme Court has recently held that the presumption against extraterritoriality applies to claims under the Alien Tort Statute, and as such, there is no federal court jurisdiction under the ATS for torts in violation of the law of nations that occur in a foreign country.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., No. 10-1491 (U.S. Apr. 17, 2013), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the presumption against extraterritoriality applies to claims under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS).1 Consequently, there is no federal court jurisdiction under the ATS for torts in violation of the law of nations that occur in a foreign country.

Kiobel signals a major retreat from the expansion over the last 30 years of federal court jurisdiction to hear overseas human rights abuse cases. Although multinational companies may cheer this ruling, human rights advocates will likely be chagrined by the new limitations imposed on ATS claims. Lower federal courts will undoubtedly be relieved to hear that they will not have to write more lengthy discourses on the history of this ancient statute, yet there remain many unanswered questions about its reach.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from