Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JUNE 2008

Supreme Court Docket Report - Decision Alert - June 23, 2008

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The Supreme Court held today that an assignee of a legal claim for money damages has standing to sue on that claim in federal court, even if, as part of the assignment, the assignee has agreed to pay all proceeds of the suit to the assignor.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published June 23, 2008

Keywords: Sprint Communications Co., APCC Services, money damages, injury, claim, individual damages, class action, Article III, dial-around calls, assignee, standing, redreessability

Article III Standing—Suits By Assignees for Collection Purposes.

Sprint Communications Co., L.P. v. APCC Services, Inc., No. 07-552 (previously discussed in the January 8, 2008 Docket Report).

The Supreme Court held today that an assignee of a legal claim for money damages has standing to sue on that claim in federal court, even if, as part of the assignment, the assignee has agreed to pay all proceeds of the suit to the assignor. The decision broadens the concepts of injury and redressability, allowing individuals who suffered an actual injury but do not have the resources to bring a claim on their own, or whose individual damages are too small to justify litigation, to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from