Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 APRIL 2014

Supreme Court Docket Report - April 7, 2014

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

To remove a civil action from state court to federal court, the defendant must "file … a notice of removal … containing a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal." 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Keywords: CAFA, jurisdictional allegations, removal notice, civil action

Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in one case of interest to the business community:


Federal Jurisdiction—Class Action Fairness Act—Sufficiency of Jurisdictional Allegations in Removal Notice

To remove a civil action from state court to federal court, the defendant must "file ... a notice of removal ... containing a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal." 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens, No. 13-719, to decide whether a notice of removal must also include evidence supporting jurisdiction if the facts establishing jurisdiction do not appear on the face of the state-court complaint. The Court's resolution of this issue will be important to all businesses seeking to remove state-court lawsuits—and especially state-court class actions—to the federal courts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from