Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MAY 2014

Supreme Court Decision Alert - May 27, 2014

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act—Tribal Sovereign Immunity

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On May 27, 2014, the Supreme Court issued one decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

Indian Gaming Regulatory Act—Tribal Sovereign Immunity

Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, No. 12-515 (described in the June 24, 2013, Docket Report)

Today, in Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, No. 12-515, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its prior holding that tribal sovereign immunity extends to suits arising out of Indian tribes' commercial activities. The Court concluded that, although the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) partially abrogates tribal sovereign immunity by allowing the states to sue Indian Tribes in federal court "to enjoin ... class III gaming activit[ies]," such as casino games, that are "located on Indian lands and conducted in violation of any Tribal-State compact" (25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii)), IGRA does not authorize suits to enjoin gaming activities located outside Indian lands. Because the Court's decision

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from